<aside> 💡 Version 1.0 | Created on January 14, 2025 Made by Roshan Raj Mishra | Gmail | LinkedIn

</aside>

🔎 Summary of Methodology

To evaluate and compare Indian cities for long-term residence suitable for a young tech professional accustomed to urban metropolitan living, we employed the following methodology.

🌈 Selection of Evaluation Criteria

Identified key factors influencing both personal lifestyle and professional growth, including:

• Tech Career Opportunities
• Affordable Housing
• Cost of Living
• Quality of Services (e.g., food delivery, quick commerce)
• Weather
• Pollution Levels
• Healthcare Facilities
• Educational Institutions
• Safety and Security
• Public Transportation
• Cultural and Recreational Opportunities
• Community and Social Life

📊 Data Collection

Sources

Data was gathered from reputable government publications, industry reports, and third-party analytics platforms such as:

• Ease of Living Index: Developed by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (smartcities.gov.in).
• Cost of Living Index: Provides up-to-date cost comparisons (numbeo.com).
• Environmental Quality Assessments: Reports on air quality and pollution levels.
• Surveys and feedback from residents and professionals living in these cities.
• City-specific reports on healthcare, education, and infrastructure growth.

Metrics

Quantified indicators such as average housing costs, AQI scores, and public transit ratings.

Rating Scale

Cities were rated on a 1 to 5 scale for each criterion:

• 1: Poor
• 2: Below Average
• 3: Average
• 4: Good
• 5: Excellent